80 results for 'cat:"Insurance" AND cat:"Vehicle"'.
J. Wiseman finds the trial court properly vacated the default judgment. The judgment was entered against the at-fault driver in this auto collision suit after the owner of the damaged company vehicle accused her insurer, Allstate, of using a valuation that did not consider the pandemic's effect on fair market value and inflation. The petition to vacate was filed and the court found the at-fault driver was not in default when the judgment was entered, nor was she provided proper notice. Affirmed.
Court: Oklahoma Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Wiseman , Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: 121053, Categories: insurance, vehicle, Due Process
J. Smith denies the insurer’s motion for summary judgment in this insurance dispute stemming from an uninsured motorist claim related to a collision involving the insured vehicle caused by another vehicle driver that fled the scene in Texas. The insurer argues the policy does not cover hit-and-runs in another state because the insured misrepresented the fact the vehicle would be garaged in Alabama and failed to timely provide the change in garaging. There is a genuine issue of material fact on if the policy was void from the beginning and that the evidence presented by the insurer fails to show that the vehicle was not at the policy’s garaged location.
Court: USDC Northern District of Alabama , Judge: Smith, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 5:23cv934, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: insurance, vehicle
J. Whitney orders a car insurance company and a driver who was injured in a collision in 2018 to submit supplemental briefs detailing whether the court should exercise its jurisdiction to resolve a policy coverage dispute in North Carolina or wait until an underlying suit in South Carolina is resolved. The collision occurred in South Carolina. Although the insurance of the driver at fault paid out according to its limit of $100,000 on the injured driver’s claim, he alleges that the costs of treatment for his injuries exceed this amount. The insurance company claims the injured driver is not entitled to additional coverage under its uninsured motorist policy because he failed to comply with certain notice provisions under North Carolina state law and the uninsured motorist policy. Thus, both parties must submit supplemental briefs to proceed.
Court: USDC Western District of North Carolina, Judge: Whitney, Filed On: April 22, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv28, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: insurance, vehicle, Contract
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Pickett finds that the lower court properly awarded the mother $1.5 million and the son $125,000 for the injuries they suffered in a three-vehicle accident where one of the drivers drove a box truck covered by the insurance company. The insurance company claims that the trial court did not conduct the conference about the addressed issue on the record, but nothing on the record shows that the trial court rejected a request to do so. There is also no need to reverse the jury's assessment of fault, because they freely accepted or rejected the conflicting witness testimony in the underlying lawsuit. Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Pickett, Filed On: April 17, 2024, Case #: CA-23-442, Categories: insurance, vehicle, Damages
J. Savoie finds that the lower court properly dismissed the driver's complaint alleging that the insurance company must cover the driver's and passenger's claims for injuries sustained in an accident with the insurance company's client. The driver argues that the insurance company's client should have had a warning sign attached to its truck, which would have helped the driver avoid the collision, but there is no authority under Louisiana law that requires the client to add an additional warning sign. Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Savoie, Filed On: April 11, 2024, Case #: CA-23-358, Categories: insurance, vehicle
J. Elgo finds the trial court improperly denied a motor’s motion for summary judgement in this underinsured motorist dispute regarding herself and two minor children. The mother alleges negligence and recklessness claims against a driver, the vehicle’s owner and the insurer. The tortfeasor’s liability coverage is identical to, not less than, the mother’s underinsured motorist coverage. This case is to be remanded for judgement in favor of the driver, owner and insurer. Reversed.
Court: Connecticut Court Of Appeals, Judge: Elgo, Filed On: April 5, 2024, Case #: AC45627, Categories: insurance, Settlements, vehicle
J. Pryor finds that the lower court properly limited the insurer's liability under the underinsured motorist policy's $1 million limit by sums the driver received from other sources. The insurer is entitled to offset the limit by a settlement in a personal-injury lawsuit and a workers' compensation award. Between the sums received from other sources, and the insurer's payment of $672,000, the driver recovered a total of $1 million, thus fulfilling the purpose of underinsured motorist coverage under Illinois law. Affirmed.
Court: 7th Circuit, Judge: Pryor, Filed On: April 1, 2024, Case #: 22-2776, Categories: insurance, vehicle, Contract
J. Whitehead denies summary judgment to the insurance company against the Insurance Fair Conduct Act claim of the insured's complaint alleging that the insurance company refused to pay her $55,000 owed for her underinsured motorist claim. It is unclear if the insurance company's offer was the result of an adequate investigation, because it is still unclear if the insured's injuries are traceable to the accident with the underinsured motorist.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Whitehead, Filed On: March 29, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv216, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: insurance, vehicle
J. Samour finds the appeals court erroneously determined the "regular use vehicle" exclusion for uninsured motorist benefits in the classic car owner's policy was unenforceable. Although this court has previously found such benefits cannot be tied to use of a particular type of vehicle, the policy at issue in this case works in tandem with a standard policy that has its own uninsured motorist benefits and, therefore, allows for the exclusion. Reversed.
Court: Colorado Supreme Court, Judge: Samour, Filed On: March 25, 2024, Case #: 2024 CO 17, Categories: insurance, vehicle, Contract
J. Newby finds that the court of appeal ruled improperly in this uninsured motorist dispute. The plain language of the statute does not allow the driver to stack his policy's uninsured motorist limits with his parents' limits. Reversed.
Court: North Carolina Supreme Court, Judge: Newby, Filed On: March 22, 2024, Case #: 281A22, Categories: insurance, vehicle
J. Dimke grants default judgment to the insurance company for its complaint that it has no duty to cover the insured's claim relating to a collision that occurred when someone else was driving his insured vehicle. The loss is excluded by the policy's employee exclusion clause, as the insurance company believes that the man who drove the car during the accident was the insured's employee. The insured's lack of cooperation in confirming or denying this prejudiced the insurance company in this case.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Washington, Judge: Dimke, Filed On: March 8, 2024, Case #: 4:23cv5043, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: insurance, vehicle, Contract
J. Gannam finds the trial court erred when it held the case was time-barred and granted summary judgment to the insurer for this underinsured motorist lawsuit. The driver argues that the case was not barred because she sued less than two years after the settlement was approved with the tortfeasor’s liability carrier. Therefore, this case is remanded as the suit was within the five-year statute of limitations. Reversed.
Court: Florida Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Gannam, Filed On: March 1, 2024, Case #: 6D23-399, Categories: Evidence, insurance, vehicle
J. Dorsey grants the taxi company's motion to dismiss the concert of action claim. The company's driver filed an insurance claim against the other driver's policy after an accident, causing the other driver's rates to go up. The other driver's concert of action claim says the claim was false but fails to identify a scheme the company had with a lawyer it referred to its driver. The only relevant allegations against the company are that its driver “most likely” knew to contact the lawyer from the cab company, which would be familiar with personal injury lawyers.
Court: USDC Nevada, Judge: Dorsey , Filed On: February 29, 2024, Case #: 2:19cv1173, NOS: Other Fraud - Torts - Personal Property, Categories: Fraud, insurance, vehicle
J. DeGravelles grants summary judgment to the insurer of the lessee of an oilfield service company’s truck and against the insurer of the vehicle’s owner. Both insurance companies are providers of co-primary underinsured motorist coverage in the accidental injury case of the truck’s driver, who was struck by another motorist. Although the insurer of the truck’s owner argues there cannot be co-primary policies because Louisiana law provides for one primary and one excess policy to provide uninsured motorist coverage, this incorrectly states the law.
Court: USDC Middle District of Louisiana, Judge: DeGravelles, Filed On: February 23, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv123, NOS: Motor Vehicle - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Evidence, insurance, vehicle
J. Marks declines to grant judgment on the pleadings in favor of four people involved in a car wreck, who challenge the insurer’s declaratory judgment action seeking a decision that it has no obligation to defend or indemnify the insureds in the underlying lawsuit. One insured person’s son was driving at the time, caused the car collision and was not listed as a driver on the policy.
Court: USDC Middle District of Alabama, Judge: Marks, Filed On: February 16, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv197, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: insurance, vehicle, Indemnification
J. Bourgeois grants a request by a health care facility that treated a personal injury litigant, quashing parts of a subpoena by an insurer for information regarding the facility’s methods for determining the amounts to charge different patients for the litigant’s type of procedure. The insurer’s discovery requests impose an undue burden on the treatment facility because they include no time periods for assessing patient records. The treatment facility also has legitimate concerns that disclosure of its billing methods could affect its ability to negotiate a higher payment for its services from the insurer.
Court: USDC Middle District of Louisiana, Judge: Bourgeois, Filed On: February 15, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv582, NOS: Motor Vehicle - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Health Care, insurance, vehicle
J. Xinies denies an insurer and its third-party vendor’s motion for summary judgment in this class Telephone Consumer Protection Act action brought by an insured. The consumer was in a vehicle accident and contacted his insurer to start a claim, the following day the vendor started contacting by a voice recording phone call in an attempt to schedule an independent medical exam. The insurer was to contact the attorney regarding the vehicle accident and consumer. Therefore, a factfinder could find that the vendor was undermining any claims by contacting the consumer and not his attorney.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Xinis, Filed On: February 14, 2024, Case #: 8:21cv2746, NOS: Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) - Other Suits, Categories: insurance, vehicle, Negligence
J. Stabile finds that the lower court properly granted summary judgment in favor of State Farm and the defendant automobile driver in this underinsured motorist dispute, stemming from a collision that occurred while the suing driver was behind the wheel of her mother’s vehicle. The plaintiff is not entitled to recover underinsured motorist benefits under her own vehicle policy. Affirmed.
Court: Pennsylvania Superior Court, Judge: Stabile, Filed On: February 13, 2024, Case #: J-A19028-23, Categories: Civil Procedure, insurance, vehicle
Per curiam, the appellate division finds that the lower court properly denied the clinic's petition to vacate an arbitration award denying it claim for no-fault medical services rendered to the insured. The law permits an insurer to deduct from first-party benefits to reimburse a person for economic loss on account of personal injury arising out of the use of a motor vehicle. Affirmed.
Court: New York Appellate Divisions, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: February 6, 2024, Case #: 00599, Categories: Arbitration, insurance, vehicle
J. Mahan grants the insurer's partial motion for summary judgment on a company owner's commercial vehicle collision coverage-related claims. The policy holder is the business, not the owner, and the owner lacks standing.
Court: USDC Nevada, Judge: Mahan , Filed On: February 1, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv879, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: insurance, vehicle, Contract